Our point of view is new and unusual; it conflicts with the commonly accepted opinions of the respective scientific disciplines on many points. The facts and observations are the same, but their interpretation may differ due to the underlying ’non-ordinary’ laws of physics. Neural processes happen at well-observable speeds, which require a dynamic description of processes instead of an ad-hoc description of state jumps. We introduce for life sciences their dynamic laws of motion (in the sense of Newton, Hamilton, and Schrödinger, based on the time derivatives of the static quantities). Furthermore, we explain why and how a fraction of charges, that constitute living matter, obey their laws of motion, creating the needed dynamic components, that can implement the needed dynamic processes. Considering them solves the mystery of how life science builds on top of science. We defy that ”the emergence of life cannot be predicted by the laws of physics” [13], furthermore, that ”the existence of life is against the laws of thermodynamics”.