Dynamic Abstract Neural Computing with Electronic Simulation (DANCES) Version 0.2.5 Glossary

Bibliography

[1] W. Gerstner, W. M. Kistler, R. Naud, L. Paninski, Neuronal Dynamics: From single neurons to networks and models of cognition and beyond, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2014.
[2] D. Johnston, S. M.-S. Wu, Foundations of Cellular Neurophysiology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts and London, England, 1995.
[3] J. von Neumann, First draft of a report on the EDVAC, IEEE Annals of the History of Computing 15 (4) (1993) 27–75. doi:10.1109/85.238389.
[4] G. Vollmer, The limits of biology, in: D. Prawitz, B. Skyrms, D. Westerståhl (Eds.), Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science IX, Vol. 134 of Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1995, pp. 659–676. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0049-237X(06)80068-6.
URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0049237X06800686
[5] J. Ngai, Brain @ 10: A decade of innovation, Neuron 112 (2024). doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2024.09.007.
[6] R. P. Feynman, Principles of scientific thinking, https://blog.hptbydts.com/richard-feynmans-principles-of-scientific-thinking (1980).
[7] J. Tuszynski, M. Kurzynski, Introduction to molecular biophysics, CRC Press, Boca Raton, London, New York, Washington D.C., 2003.
[8] B. Drukarch, M. M. M. Wilhelmus, S. Shrivastava, The thermodynamic theory of action potential propagation: a sound basis for unification of the physics of nerve impulses, Reviews in the Neurosciences 33 (3) (2022) 285–302 [cited 2025-07-12]. doi:10.1515/revneuro-2021-0094.
URL https://doi.org/10.1515/revneuro-2021-0094
[9] A. L. Hodgkin, A. F. Huxley, A quantitative description of membrane current and its application to conduction and excitation in nerve, J. Physiol. 117 (1952) 500–544.
[10] S. Moradi, R. Manohar, The impact of on-chip communication on memory technologies for neuromorphic systems, Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics 52 (1) (2018) 014003.
[11] J. Végh, On implementing technomorph biology for inefficient computing, Applied Sciences 15 (11) (2025). doi:10.3390/app15115805.
URL https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/15/11/5805
[12] E. Schrödinger, Is life based on the laws of physics?, Cambridge University Press, Canto, 1992, pp. 76–85.
[13] Y. A. Cengel, On entropy, information, and conservation of information, Entropy 23 (6) (2021). doi:10.3390/e23060779.
URL https://www.mdpi.com/1099-4300/23/6/779
[14] T. J. Sejnowski, C. Koch, C. P. S, Computational neuroscience, Science 9 (1988) 1299–306. doi:10.1126/science.3045969.
[15] G. Buzsáki, Neural syntax: cell assemblies, synapsembles, and readers, Neuron 68 (4) (2010) 362–85. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2010.09.023.
[16] J. Végh, Á. J. Berki, Towards generalizing the information theory for neural communication, Entropy 24 (8) (2022) 1086–. doi:10.3390/e24081086.
[17] von Neumann, John, The Computer and the Brain, New Haven, Yale University Press, 1958.
URL https://complexityexplorer.s3.amazonaws.com/supplemental_materials/5.6+Artificial+Life/The+Computer+and+The+Brain_text.pdf
[18] L. Abbott, T. J. Sejnowski, Neural Codes and Distributed Representations, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1999.
[19] R. P. Feynman, Feynman Lectures on Computation, CRC Press, 2018.
[20] D. Hebb, The Organization of Behavior, New York: Wiley and Sons, 1949.
[21] N. Caporale, Y. Dan, Spike Timing–Dependent Plasticity: A Hebbian Learning Rule, Annual Review of Neuroscience 31 (1) (2008) 25–46, pMID: 18275283. doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.31.060407.125639.
URL https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.31.060407.125639
[22] J. Végh, The ’non-ordinary laws’ of physics describing life, arXiv, 1 (2025).
[23] J. Végh, Algorithm for describing neuronal electric operation, Algorithms 1 (2025). doi:10.3390/a19010006.
[24] C. Koch, Biophysics of Computation, Oxford University Press, New York, Oxford, 1999.
[25] J. Végh, Revising the classic computing paradigm and its technological implementations, Informatics 8 (4) (2021). doi:10.3390/informatics8040071.
[26] J. Végh, Á. J. Berki, On the Role of Speed in Technological and Biological Information Transfer for Computations, Acta Biotheoretica 70 (4) (2022) 26. doi:10.1007/s10441-022-09450-6.
URL https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10441-022-09450-6
[27] N. S. Hsu, H. Y. Fang, K. K. David, J. W. G. Gnadt, C. Peng, E. M. Talley, J. M. Ward, J. Ngai, W. J. Koroshetz, The promise of the brain initiative: Nih strategies for understanding neural circuit function, Current Opinion in Neurobiology 65 (2020).
[28] J. Végh, A. J. Berki, Revisiting neural information, computing and linking capacity, Mathematical Biology and Engineering 20 (2023) 12380–12403. doi:10.3934/mbe.2023551.
[29] J. Végh, A.-J. Berki, Why learning and machine learning are different, Advances in Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning 1 (2021) 131–148. doi:10.54364/AAIML.2021.1109.
[30] P. Mitra, Fitting elephants in modern machine learning by statistically consistent interpolation., Nature Machine Intelligence 3 (2021). doi:10.1038/s42256-021-00345-8.
[31] Human Brain Project, A closer look at scientific advances (2023).
URL https://sos-ch-dk-2.exo.io/public-website-production-2022/filer_public/6f/70/6f706305-a2e3-45b8-a42b-dfb476222a6a/230413_hpb22_digital.pdf
[32] C. E. Shannon, A mathematical theory of communication, The Bell System Technical Journal 27 (3) (1948) 379–423. doi:10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x.
[33] C. E. Shannon, The Bandwagon, IRE Transactions in Information Theory 2 (1956) 3.
URL http://csc.ucdavis.edu/~cmg/papers/Shannon.IRETransInfoTh1956b.pdf
[34] Y. Wang, R. Wang, X. Xu, Neural energy supply-consumption properties based on hodgkin-huxley model., Neural Plast. (2017) 6207141doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/6207141.
URL https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5337805/
[35] B. Drukarch, M. Wilhelmus, Thinking about the action potential: the nerve signal as a window to the physical principles guiding neuronal excitability, Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience 17 (2023). doi:10.3389/fncel.2023.1232020.
[36] Human Brain Project: The HBP flagship 1st technical project review (2015).
[37] P. W. Anderson, More Is Different, Science 177 (1972) 393–396. doi:10.1126/science.177.4047.393.
[38] J. Végh, Can ’non-ordinary laws of physics’ describe living matter?, arXiv (2025). doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5217729.
[39] A. Kahana, D. Lancet, Self-reproducing catalytic micelles as nanoscopic protocell precursors, Nature Reviews Chemistry 5 (2021) 870–878. doi:doi.org/10.1038/s41570–021–00329–7.
[40] A. Kahana, L. Segev, D. Lancet, Attractor dynamics drives self-reproduction in protobiological catalytic networks, Cell Reports Physical Science 4 (2023). doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xcrp.2023.101384.
[41] E. R. Kandel, J. H. Schwartz, T. M. Jessell, S. A. Siegelbaum, A. J. Hudspeth, Principles of Neural Science, 5th Edition, The McGraw-Hill Medical, New York Chicago etc., 2013.
[42] C. Bunne, S. Stark, G. Gut, et al., Learning single-cell perturbation responses using neural optimal transport, Nature Methods 20 (2023) 1759–1768. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-023-01969-x.
[43] K. S. Cole, H. J. Curtis, Electric impedance of the squid giant axon during activity, The Journal of General Physiology (1939). doi:http://doi.org/10.1085/jgp.22.5.649.
[44] C. F. Craver, When mechanistic models explain, Synthese 153 (3) (2006) 355–376. doi:10.1007/s11229-006-9097-x.
[45] B. Ermentrout, T. H. David, Mathematical Foundations of Neuroscience, Springer, New York, 2010.
[46] Gerstner, Kistler, Spiking Neuron Models. Single Neurons, Populations, Plasticity (2002).
URL https://neuronaldynamics.epfl.ch/
[47] T. McKenna, J. Davis, S. Zornetzer, Single Neuron Computation, Neural Networks: Foundations to Applications, Academic Press, 2014.
URL https://books.google.hu/books?id=n7CjBQAAQBAJ
[48] M. Almog, A. Korngreen, Is realistic neuronal modeling realistic?, J Neurophysiol. 5 (2016) 2180–2209. doi:doi:10.1152/jn.00360.2016.
[49] Holland, L. and de Regt, H.W. and Drukarch, B., Two scientific perspectives on nerve signal propagation: how incompatible approaches jointly promote progress in explanatory understanding., History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 46 (2024). doi:10.1007/s40656-024-00644-4.
[50] M. H. P. Kole, S. U. Ilschner, B. M. Kampa, S. R. Williams, P. C. Ruben, G. J. Stuart, Action potential generation requires a high sodium channel density in the axon initial segment, Nature Neuroscience 11 (2008) 178–186. doi:10.1038/nn2040.
URL https://www.nature.com/articles/nn2040
[51] M. Rasband, The axon initial segment and the maintenance of neuronal polarity, Nat Rev Neurosci 11 (2010) 552–562. doi:10.1038/nrn2852.
[52] M. Kole, G. Stuart, Signal processing in the axon initial segment, Neuron 73 (2) (2012) 235–247. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2012.01.007.
URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0896627312000505
[53] C. Y.-M. Huang, M. N. Rasband, Axon initial segments: structure, function, and disease, Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1420 (2018) 46–61. doi:10.1111/nyas.13718.
[54] C. Leterrier, The axon initial segment: An updated viewpoint, Journal of Neuroscience 38 (9) (2018) 2135–2145. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1922-17.2018.
[55] D. Perkel, M. B., Electrotonic properties of neurons: steady-state compartmental model., J Neurophysiol. 41 (1978) 621–39. doi:10.1152/jn.1978.41.3.621.
[56] G. Somjen, SENSORY CODING in the mammalian nervous system, New York, MEREDITH CORPORATION, 1972. doi:10.1007/978-1-4684-1707-4.
[57] J. Végh, Finally, how many efficiencies the supercomputers have?, The Journal of Supercomputing 76 (12) (2020) 9430–9455, regularly updated at https://arxiv.org/abs/2001.01266.
URL http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11227-020-03210-4
[58] J. Végh, Which scaling rule applies to Artificial Neural Networks, Neural Computing and Applications 33 (1) (2021) 16847–16864. doi:10.1007/s00521-021-06456-y.
URL http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00521-021-06456-y
[59] T. Heimburg, Die Physik der Nerven, Physik Journal 8 (3) (2009) 33–39.
[60] B. J. Patlak, M. Ortiz, Slow currents through single sodium channels of the adult rat heart, J. Gen. Physiol. 86 (1985) 89–104.
[61] P. F. Cranefield, F. A. Dodge, Slow Conduction in the Heart, Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, 1980, pp. 149–171.
[62] B. Linder, J. Garcia-Ojalvo, A. Neiman, L. Schimansky-Geier, Effects of noise in excitable systems, Physics reports 392 (6) (2004) 321–424.
[63] A. Losonczy, J. Magee, Integrative properties of radial oblique dendrites in hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurons, Neuron 50 (2006) 291–307. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2006.03.016.
[64] M. C. Kiernan, K. Cikurel, H. Bostock, Effects of temperature on the excitability properties of human motor axons, Brain 124 (4) (2001) 816–825. arXiv:https://academic.oup.com/brain/article-pdf/124/4/816/1014662/1240816.pdf, doi:10.1093/brain/124.4.816.
URL https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/124.4.816
[65] B. C. Abbott, A. V. Hill, J. V. Howarth, The positive and negative heat production associated with a nerve impulse., Proc. R. Soc. London. B. 148 (1958) 149–187.
[66] B. Drukarch, M. Wilhelmus, Thinking about the nerve impulse: A critical analysis of the electricity-centered conception of nerve excitability, Progress in Neurobiology 169 (2018) 172–185. doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2018.06.009.
[67] R. Appali, S. Petersen, U. van Rienen, A comparision of Hodgkin-Huxley and soliton neural theories, Advances in Radio Science 8 (2010) 75–79. doi:10.5194/ars-8-75-2010.
[68] D. E. Pence, Potential Controversies: Causation and the Hodgkin and Huxley Equations, Philosophy of Science 84 (5) (2017) 1177–1188. doi:10.1086/694040.
[69] Z. Zhu, Q. Chen, X. Zhang, Model approach of piezoelectric membrane for a two-capacitive neuron, and dynamics., Nonlinear Dyn 113 (2025) 10461–10477. doi:10.1007/s11071-024-10784-8.
[70] T. Heimburg, A. D. Jackson, On soliton propagation in biomembranes and nerves, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2005) 9790–9795doi:10.1073/pnas.0503823102.
[71] J. Végh, The unified cross-disciplinary model of the operation of neurons (2026). arXiv:2507.11448.
URL https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2507.11448
[72] B. Podobnik, M. Jusup, Z. Tiganj, W.-X. Wangi, J. M. Buld, H. E. Stanley, Biological conservation law as an emerging functionality in dynamical neuronal networks, Applied Physical Sciences 45 (2017) 11826–11831. doi:10.1073/pnas.1705704114.
[73] I. I. Ryzhkov, D. V. Lebedev, V. S. Solodovnichenko, A. V. Minakov, M. M. Simunin, On the origin of membrane potential in membranes with polarizable nanopores, Journal of Membrane Science 549 (2018) 616–630. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2017.11.073.
URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0376738817327060
[74] H. Tamagawa, M. Sasaki, W. Lin, B. Delalande, Is the membrane permeability the primary property for the membrane potential generation?, Mod Concept Material Sci. 6 (2024).
[75] Hirohisa Tamagawa and Titus Mulembo and Vera Maura Fernandes de Lima and Wolfgang Hanke, Analyses of HH and GHK equations with another perspective: Can ion adsorption also govern trans-membrane potential?, Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology 167 (2021) 3–11. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2021.10.004.
URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0079610721001279
[76] A. M. Brown, A companion guide to the Hodgkin-Huxley papers, The Physiological Society, Seattle, WA 98195, USA, 2022.
[77] C. Y.-M. Huang, M. N. Rasband, Axon initial segments: structure, function, and disease, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1420 (2018). doi:10.1111/nyas.13718.
[78] W. B. Levy, V. G. Calvert, Communication consumes 35 times more energy than computation in the human cortex, but both costs are needed to predict synapse number, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118 (18) (2021) e2008173118. doi:10.1073/pnas.2008173118.
[79] J. Rinzel, Discussion: Electrical excitability of cells, theory and experiment: Review of the Hodgkin-Huxley foundation and an update, Bulletin of Mathematical Biology 52 (1) (1990) 5–23.
URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0092824005800035
[80] Khorsand P and Chance F , Transient Responses to Rapid Changes in Mean and Variance in Spiking Models, PLoS ONE 3 (11) (2008) e3786. doi:doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0003786.
[81] C. Koch, T. A. Poggio, A theoretical analysis of electrical properties of spines, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences 218 (1983) 455 – 477.
[82] J. M. Beggs, D. Plenz, Neuronal Avalanches in Neocortical Circuits, Journal of Neuroscience 23 (35) (2003) 11167–11177. arXiv:https://www.jneurosci.org/content/23/35/11167.full.pdf, doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-35-11167.2003.
[83] A. Mason, A. Nicoll, K. Stratford, Synaptic transmission between individual pyramidal neurons of the rat visual cortex in vitro, The Journal of Neuroscience 11 (1991) 79–84.
[84] A. Goikolea-Vives, H. Stolp, Connecting the Neurobiology of Developmental Brain Injury: Neuronal Arborisation as a Regulator of Dysfunction and Potential Therapeutic Target, Int J Mol Sci 15 (2021). doi:10.3390/ijms22158220.
[85] K. Hasegawa, K.-i. Kuwako, Molecular mechanisms regulating the spatial configuration of neurites, Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology 129 (2022) 103–114, special Issue: Emerging biology of cellular protrusions in 3D architecture by Mayu Inaba and Mark Terasaki. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semcdb.2022.02.015.
URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1084952122000544
[86] S. I. Walker, Origins of life: a problem for physics, a key issues review, Reports on Progress in Physics 80 (9) (2017) 092601. doi:10.1088/1361-6633/aa7804.
URL https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6633/aa7804
[87] A. L. Hodgkin, The conduction of the nervous impulse, Liverpool University Press, Liverpool, UK, 1964, 1964.
[88] A. Das, The special theory of relativity: a mathematical exposition, 1st Edition, Springer-Verlag New York, 1993.
[89] Hermann Minkowski, Die Grundgleichungen für die electromagnetischen Vorgänge in bewegten Körpern, Nachrichten von der Königlichen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen (in German) (1908) 53–111.
[90] W. Maass, T. Natschläger, H. Markram, Real-time computing without stable states: A new framework for neural computation based on perturbations, Neural Computation 14 (11) (2002) 2531–2560. doi:10.1162/089976602760407955.
[91] Y. Prut, E. Vaadia, H. Bergman, I. Haalman, H. Slovin, M. Abeles, Spatiotemporal Structure of Cortical Activity: Properties and Behavioral Relevance, J. Neurophysiol 79 (1998).
[92] D. Plenz, A. Aertsen, Neural dynamics in cortex-striatum ci-cultures – II. Spatiotemporal Characteristics of Neural Activity, Neuroscience 70/4 (1996) 893–924.
[93] J. Végh, Why do we need to Introduce Temporal Behavior in both Modern Science and Modern Computing, Global Journal of Computer Science and Technology: Hardware & Computation 20/1 (2020) 13–29.
URL https://doi.org/10.34257/GJCSTAVOL20IS1PG13
[94] G. Buzsáki, J. Végh, Space, time and memory, 1st Edition, Oxford University Press, 2025.
URL https://global.oup.com/academic/product/space-time-and-memory-9780192882547
[95] A. El Hady, B. B. Machta, Mechanical surface waves accompany action potential propagation, Nature Communications 6 (2019) 6697. doi:10.1038/ncomms7697.
[96] D. G. Miller, THERMODINAMICS OF IRREVERSIBLE PROCESSES THE EXPERIMENTAL VERIFICATION OF THE ONSAGER RECIPROCAL RELATIONS , Tech. Rep. Contract No. W-7405-eng-48, UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, Lawrence Radiation Laboratory, Livermore, California (1959). doi:10.1021/cr60203a003.
[97] T. Heimburg, Thermal Biophysics of Membranes, 1st Edition, 2007 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim, 2007.
[98] H. A. Ulku, A. A. Ergin, Application of analytical retarded-time potential expressions to the solution of time domain integral equations, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 59 (11) (2011) 4123–4131. doi:10.1109/TAP.2011.2164180.
[99] R. Ho, M. Horowitz, More about wires and wire models, https://web.stanford.edu/class/archive/ee/ee371/ee371.1066/lectures/lect_09_1up.pdf (accessed on 29 April 2025) (2007).
[100] Wikipedia, Roemer’s determination of the speed of light, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R%C3%B8mer%27s_determination_of_the_speed_of_light (2024).
[101] I. Newton, Philosophiae naturalis principia mathematica (1687).
URL https://www.britannica.com/topic/Principia
[102] A. Einstein, On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies, Annalen der Physik (in German) 10 (17) (1905) 891–921. doi:10.1002/andp.19053221004.
[103] S. Walter, Hermann Minkowski and the scandal of spacetime, ESI News 1 (3) (2008) 6–8.
[104] H. Schmidgen, Of frogs and men: the origins of psychophysiological time experiments, 1850-1865 (1850).
URL https://epub.uni-regensburg.de/27126/1/schmidgen.pdf
[105] E. Phsychology, The rise of experimental psychology (1850).
URL https://ebrary.net/269412/psychology/helmholtz
[106] W. S. McCulloch, W. Pitts, A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity, j-BULL-MATH-BIOPHYS 5 (4) (1943) 115–133. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02478259.
URL http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF02478259
[107] B. Alberts, A. Johnson, J. Lewis, et al., Molecular biology of the cell (2002).
URL https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK26910/
[108] I. Popov, Z. Zhu, A. e. a. Young-Gonzales, Search for a Grotthuss mechanism through the observation of proton transfer., Commun Chem 6 (2023). doi:10.1038/s42004-023-00878-6.
[109] J. Isakovic, I. Dobbs-Dixon, D. Chaudhury, et al., Modeling of inhomogeneous electromagnetic fields in the nervous system: a novel paradigm in understanding cell interactions, disease etiology and therapy, Sci Rep 8 (2018). doi:10.1038/s41598-018-31054-9.
[110] L. Pyenson, Hermann Minkowski and Einstein’s special theory of relativity, Archive for History of Exact Sciences 17 (1977) 71–95. doi:10.1007/BF00348403.
[111] I. Abraham, The case for rejecting the memristor as a fundamental circuit element, Nature Scientific Reports 8 (2018) 10972. doi:10.1038/s41598-018-29394-7.
[112] M. Stemmler, C. Koch, How voltage-dependent conductances can adapt to maximize the information encoded by neuronal firing rate, Nat Neurosci 2 (1999) 521–527.
[113] J. M. Bower, D. Beeman, The Book of GENESIS: Exploring Realistic Neural Models, 2003.
URL http://genesis-sim.org/GENESIS/iBoG/iBoGpdf/
[114] Q. Zheng, W. G.W., Poisson-Boltzmann-Nernst-Planck model, J Chem Phys 19 (2011). doi:10.1063/1.3581031.
[115] D. Forcella, J. Zaanen, D. Valentinis, D. van der Marel, Electromagnetic properties of viscous charged fluids, Phys. Rev. B 90 (2014) 035143. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.90.035143.
URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.90.035143
[116] T. Heimburg, The mechanical properties of nerves, the size of the action potential, and consequences for the brain, Chemistry and Physics of Lipids 267 (2025) 105461. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemphyslip.2024.105461.
URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0009308424000860
[117] B. Bean, The action potential in mammalian central neurons, Nature Reviews Neuroscience 8 (2007). doi:10.1038/nrn2148.
[118] D. S. Bassett, P. Zurn, J. I. Gold, On the nature and use of models in network neuroscience, Nature Reviews Neuroscience 19 (2018) 566–578. doi:10.1038/s41583-018-0038-8.
[119] N. Hyun, K. Hyun, K. Lee, B. Kaang, Temperature dependence of action potential parameters in aplysia neurons, Neurosignals 20 (2012) 252–64. doi:10.1159/000334960.
[120] R. Stock, J. Kaiser, E. Müller, et al., Parametrizing analog multi-compartment neurons with genetic algorithms, Open Res Europe 3 (2023). doi:10.12688/openreseurope.15775.1.
[121] J. Végh, A model for storing and processing information in technological and biological computing systems, in: 2021 international conference on computational science and computational intelligence; foundations of computer science, Vol. 21, IEEE Las Vegas, USA; July 26-29, IEEE, 2021, p. FCS4404.
[122] H. Tamagawa, S. Morita, Membrane potential generated by ion adsorption, Membranes 4 (2) (2014) 257–274. doi:10.3390/membranes4020257.
URL https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0375/4/2/257
[123] H. Tamagawa, T. Nakahata, R. Sugimori, B. Delalande, M. T, The Membrane Potential Has a Primary Key Equation, Acta Biotheoretica 71 (15) (2023). doi:10.1007/s10441-023-09467-5.
[124] A. Baumgart, J. R. Clarke, G. C. Cranfield, R. Zerlotti, F. T. Buoninsegni, Membrane binding of hydrophobic ions: Dipole potential revisited, Biophysical Journal 124 (2025). doi:10.1016/j.bpj.2024.11.557.
[125] K. Doblhoff-Dier, M. T. Koper, Electric double layer of pt(111): Known unknowns and unknown knowns, Current Opinion in Electrochemistry 39 (2023) 101258. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coelec.2023.101258.
URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451910323000510
[126] L. J. Gentet, G. J. Stuart, J. D. Clements, Direct measurement of specific membrane capacitance in neurons, Biophysical Journal 79 (1) (2000) 314–320. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3495(00)76293-X.
URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S000634950076293X
[127] I. Goychuk, P. Hänggi, J. L. Vega, S. Miret-Artés, Non-Markovian stochastic resonance: Three-state model of ion channel gating, Phys. Rev. E 71 (2005) 061906. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.71.061906.
URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevE.71.061906
[128] G. Baranauskas, M. Martina, Sodium Currents Activate without a Hodgkin and Huxley Type Delay in Central Mammalian Neurons, The Journal of Neuroscience 26 (2006) 671–684.
[129] M. F. Schneider, Living systems approached from physical principles, Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology 162 (2021) 2–25, on the Physics of Excitable Media. Waves in Soft and Living Matter, their Transmission at the Synapse and their Cooperation in the Brain. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2020.10.001.
URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0079610720301000
[130] I. Karbat, et al., Voltage sensing comes to rest, Cell 178 (2019).
[131] G. Wisedchaisri, et al., Resting-state structure and gating mechanism of a voltage-gated sodium channel, Cell 178 (2019) 993.1003.e12. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2019.06.031.
[132] C. Kutzner, D. A. Köpfer, J.-P. Machtens, B. L. de Groot, C. Song, U. Zachariae, Insights into the function of ion channels by computational electrophysiology simulations, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1858 (2016) 1741–1752.
[133] B. Hille, A. C. M, R. McKinnon, Ion channels: From idea to reality, Nature Medicine 5 (10) (1999) 1105–1109.
[134] Iwasa, K and Tasaki, I. and Gibbons, RC., Swelling of nerve fibers associated with action potentials, Science 17 (4467) (1980) 338–9. doi:10.1126/science.7423196.
[135] T. Ling, K. Boyle, V. Zuckerman, T. Flores, C. Ramakrishnan, K. Deisseroth, D. Palanker, High-speed interferometric imaging reveals dynamics of neuronal deformation during the action potential., Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 117 (19) (2020) 10278–10285. doi:10.1073/pnas.1920039117.
[136] I. Tasaki, K. Iwasa, Rapid mechanical changes in crab nerve and squid axon during action potentials, J Physiol (Paris) 77 (1981) 1055–9.
[137] J. Végh, How Hodgkin and Huxley measured that the axonal speed obeys the Stokes-Einstein relation, Biosystems (2025).
[138] T. Heimburg, The important consequences of the reversible heat production in nerves and the adiabaticity of the action potential, Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology 162 (2021) 26–40, on the Physics of Excitable Media. Waves in Soft and Living Matter, their Transmission at the Synapse and their Cooperation in the Brain. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2020.07.007.
URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0079610720300729
[139] D. Fox, The brain, reimagined. brain cells communicate with mechanical pulses, not electric signals., Sci. Am. 318 (2018) 60–67.
[140] J. Végh, Dynamic Abstract Neural Computing with Electronic Simulation, https://jvegh.github.io/DANCES/ (Accessed on Mar 03, 2026) (2026).
[141] Extremtech, Hydrostatic water column on an elastic plate, https://www.sphinxsys.org/html/examples/example8_2D_hydrostatic_fsi.html (2021).
[142] C. Zhang, M. Rezavand, Y. Zhu, Y. Yu, D. Wu, W. Zhang, J. Wang, X. Hu, SPHinXsys: an open-source multi-physics and multi-resolution library based on smoothed particle hydrodynamics, Computer Physics Communications 267 (2021).
[143] I. Nemenman, G. D. Lewen, W. Bialek, R. R. de Ruyter van Steveninck, Neural Coding of Natural Stimuli: Information at Sub-Millisecond Resolution, PLOS Computational Biology 4 (3) (2008) 1–12. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000025.
[144] P. Sterling, S. Laughlin, Principles of Neural Design, 1st Edition, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts and London, England, 2017.
[145] D. Purves, G. J. Augustine, D. Fitzpatrick, L. C. Katz, A.-S. LaMantia, J. O. McNamara, S. M. Williams (Eds.), Neuroscience, 2nd Edition, Sinauer Associates, 2001.
URL https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK10799/
[146] A. Boldini, M. Porfiri, A non-ideal solution theory for the mechanics and electrochemistry of charged membranes, npj Comput Mater (2022). doi:10.1038/s41524-022-00827-2.
[147] D. Bianchi, A. Marasco, A. Limongiello, et al., On the mechanisms underlying the depolarization block in the spiking dynamics of ca1 pyramidal neurons., J Comput Neurosci 33 (2012) 207–225. doi:10.1007/s10827-012-0383-y.
[148] T. Tansey, Alan Hodgkin, Chance and design: reminiscences of science in peace and war, Vol. 37, Cambridge University Press, 1992, 2012. doi:10.1017/S0025727300058555.
[149] C. F. Craver, Physical law and mechanistic explanation in the hodgkin and huxley model of the action potential, Philosophy of Science 75 (5) (2008) 1022–1033. doi:10.1086/594543.
[150] M. Oleksowicz, Physics for neuroscience: the story of hodgkin and huxley before any interpretation, in: Proceedings of the SISFA 43rd Annual Conference, Padova, 5-8, sept 2023; at Padova, Italy, 2024. doi:10.6093/978-88-6887-297-7.
[151] G. Buzsáki, The Brain from Inside Out, 1st Edition, Oxford University Press, 2019.
[152] M. Carandini, F. Mechler, C. Leonard, J. Movshon, Spike train encoding by regular-spiking cells of the visual cortex, J Neurophysiol. (1996) 3425–41doi:10.1152/jn.1996.76.5.3425.
[153] D. Chu, M. Prokopenko, J. C. Ray, Computation by natural systems, Interface Focus 8, accessed: 2025-03-20 (2018). doi:10.1098/rsfs.2018.0058.
[154] E. Human Brain Project, Human Brain Project, https://www.humanbrainproject.eu/en/ (2018).
[155] Human Brain Project, Hodgkin-Huxley Neuron Builder, https://hhnb.ebrains-italy.eu/hh-neuron-builder/ (2023).
[156] S. J. van Albada, A. G. Rowley, J. Senk, M. Hopkins, M. Schmidt, A. B. Stokes, D. R. Lester, M. Diesmann, S. B. Furber, Performance Comparison of the Digital Neuromorphic Hardware SpiNNaker and the Neural Network Simulation Software NEST for a Full-Scale Cortical Microcircuit Model, Frontiers in Neuroscience 12 (2018) 291.
URL https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/neuroscience/articles/10.3389/fnins.2018.00291/full
[157] J. Végh, How Amdahl’s Law limits performance of large artificial neural networks, Brain Informatics 6 (2019) 1–11. doi:10.1186/s40708-019-0097-2.
URL https://braininformatics.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s40708-019-0097-2
[158] US DOE Office of Science, Report of a Roundtable Convened to Consider Neuromorphic Computing Basic Research Needs (2015).
URL https://science.osti.gov/-/media/ascr/pdf/programdocuments/docs/Neuromorphic-Computing-Report_FNLBLP.pdf
[159] D. Markovic, A. Mizrahi, D. Querlioz, J. Grollier, Physics for neuromorphic computing, Nature Reviews Physics 2 (2020) 499–510. doi:https://www.nature.com/articles/s42254-020-0208-2.pdf.
[160] A. Mehonic, A. J. Kenyon, Brain-inspired computing needs a master plan, Nature 604 (2022) 255–260. doi:10.1038/s41586-021-04362-w.
[161] C. Mead, Neuromorphic electronic systems, Proc. IEEE 78 (1990) 1629–1636.
[162] G. Bell, D. H. Bailey, J. Dongarra, A. H. Karp, K. Walsh, A look back on 30 years of the Gordon Bell Prize, The International Journal of High Performance Computing Applications 31 (6) (2017) 469–484.
URL https://doi.org/10.1177/1094342017738610
[163] S. Furber and S. Temple, Neural systems engineering, J. R. Soc. Interface 4 (2007) 193–206. doi:10.1098/rsif.2006.0177.
[164] A. Cho, Tests measure progress of quantum computers, Science 364 (6447) (2018) 1218–1219. doi:10.1126/science.364.6447.1218.
[165] A. G. Dimitrov, A. A. Lazar, J. D. Victor, Information theory in neuroscience, Journal of Computational Neuroscience 30/1 (2011) 1–5. doi:10.1007/s10827-011-0314-3.
[166] D. H. Johnson, Information theory and neuroscience: Why is the intersection so small?, IEEE, 2008, pp. 104–108. doi:10.1109/ITW.2008.4578631.
[167] L. Nizami, Information theory is abused in neuroscience, Cybernetics & Human Knowing 26 (4) (2019) 47–97.
URL https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/333651513.pdf
[168] T. Berger, W. B. Levy, A Mathematical Theory of Energy Efficient Neural Computation and Communication, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 56 (2) (2010) 852–874. doi:10.1109/TIT.2009.2037089.
[169] G. Buzsáki, K. Mizuseki, The log-dynamic brain: how skewed distributions affect network operations, Nature Reviews Neuroscience 15 (2014) 264–278. doi:10.1038/nrn3687.
[170] S. Gordon (Ed.), The Synaptic Organization of the Brain, 5th Edition, Oxford Academic, New York, 2005. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195159560.001.1.
[171] N. Rouleau, M. Levin, Discussions of machine versus living intelligence need more clarity, Nat Mach Intell 6 (2024) 1424–1426. doi:10.1038/s42256-024-00955-y.
URL https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-024-00955-y
[172] Editorial, Seeking clarity rather than strong opinions on intelligence, Nat Mach Intell 6 (2024). doi:10.1038/s42256-024-00968-7.
[173] D. M. MacKay, W. S. McCulloch, The limiting information capacity of a neuronal link, The bulletin of mathematical biophysics 14 (2) (1952) 127–135.
[174] T. J. Sejnowski, The computer and the brain revisited, IEEE Annals of the History of Computing 11 (03) (1989) 197–201. doi:10.1109/MAHC.1989.10028.
[175] IEEE/Accellera, Systems initiative, http://www.accellera.org/downloads/standards/systemc (2017).
[176] C. D. Black, J. Donovan, B. Bunton, A. Keist, SystemC: From the Ground Up, 2nd Edition, Springer, New York, 2010.
[177] J. Végh, von Neumann’s missing ”Second Draft”: what it should contain, in: Proceedings of the 2020 International Conference on Computational Science and Computational Intelligence (CSCI’20: December 16-18, 2020, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA, IEEE Computer Society, 2020, pp. 1260–1264. doi:10.1109/CSCI51800.2020.00235.